Featuring Nick Sayers @RevolutionDebates
Many scholars and apologists say the Granville Sharp rule was unknown to the King James translators, causing Christ’s deity to be weakened in Titus 2.13 and 2 Peter 1.1. Are they right?
Nick masterfully answers this topic, showing us why the KJB is perfect as it stands, and exposing modern scholarship for making such baseless claims.
Thank you all for your prayers and support!
KJV Cherrywood Verse Plaques:
https://kjvco.de/bibleplaque
Truth is Christ Links, Downloads, Donations:
https://kjvco.de/truthischrist
–
Examined Verses
Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ; Titus 2.13 KJB
Simon Peter, a servant and an apostle of Jesus Christ, to them that have obtained like precious faith with us through the righteousness of God and our Saviour Jesus Christ: 2 Peter 1.1 KJB
–
Chapters
0:00 Intro
1:36 Who was Granville Sharp?
4:02 Granville Sharp Rule explained
9:33 Did KJV translators know this rule?
13:59 Codex Sinaiticus variant in 2 Peter 1.1
16:31 Is the rule “ironclad” in Greek?
17:36 Scholarship of KJV vs modern translators
21:52 Did the KJV get it right in 2 Peter 1.1?
23:55 Did the KJV get it right in Titus 2.13?
29:15 Deity of Christ: KJV vs Modern Bibles
41:57 Concluding Thoughts
–
All glory to the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ!